Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾÇÀÇ ±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® ½Ä¸³ ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÇÁú°ñ µÎ²²¿Í Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸®: 3Â÷¿øÀ¸·Î À籸¼ºÇÑ CT ¿µ»óÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Cortical bone thickness and root proximity at mandibular interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2008³â 38±Ç 6È£ p.397 ~ 406
ÀÓÁÖÀº, ÀÓ¿øÈñ, ÀüÀ±½Ä,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓÁÖÀº ( Lim Ju-Eun ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø
ÀÓ¿øÈñ ( Lim Won-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÀüÀ±½Ä ( Chun Youn-Sic ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø

Abstract

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®ÀÇ ½Ä¸³ ºÎÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ÁÖ·Î ±¸Ä¡ºÎ Ä¡±Ù»çÀÌ °ø°£¿¡ ÁýÁßµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÀüÄ¡¿¡¼­ ±¸Ä¡¿¡ À̸£´Â Ä¡¾Æ°£ÀÇ ÇÇÁú°ñ µÎ²²¿Í Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸®¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±³Á¤¿ë ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®(¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®) ½Ä¸³ ½Ã¿¡ Âü°íÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÓ»óÀû ÁöħÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇØ ¼ºÀÎ 28¸í(³²ÀÚ 14¸í, ¿©ÀÚ 14¸í)ÀÇ CT¸¦ V-works 4.0TMÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 3Â÷¿ø ¿µ»óÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁßÀýÄ¡¿¡¼­ Á¦2´ë±¸Ä¡¿¡ À̸£´Â ¸ðµç Ä¡¾Æ »çÀ̸¦ Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃËÁ¡À» Áö³ª¸é¼­ ±³ÇÕ Æò¸é¿¡ ¼öÁ÷ÀÌ µÇµµ·Ï À߶ó 90¡Æ ´Ü¸éÀ» Çü¼ºÇÑ ÈÄ Ä¡Á¶Á¤À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ³ôÀ̸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© 0, 15, 30, 45¡ÆÀÇ °¢µµ¸¦ ÁÖ¾î ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ä¡Á¶Á¤À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ 2, 4, 6 mm ³ôÀÌ¿¡¼­ ±³ÇÕ Æò¸é¿¡ ÆòÇàÇÏ°Ô À߶ó 90¡Æ ´Ü¸éÀ» ¸¸µç ÈÄ Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸®¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²´Â ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¿¡¼­ ±¸Ä¡ºÎ·Î °¥¼ö·Ï µÎ²¨¿öÁö´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, 5-6°ú 1-1 »çÀÌ, 6-7°ú 1-1, 1-2, 2-3 »çÀÌ¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù (p £¼ .05). Ä¡Á¶Á¤À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ 2 mm ³ôÀ̸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡¼­ °¢µµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´°í, 4 - 6 mm ³ôÀÌ¿¡ ½Ä¸³½Ã 30 - 45o ÀÌ»óÀÇ °¢µµ¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇØ¾ß ÇÇÁú°ñ º¸À¯·®(engage ¾ç)¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸® ÃøÁ¤ °á°ú 4-5, 5-6, 6-7 »çÀÌ°¡ Ä¡±Ù ¼Õ»ó ¾øÀÌ ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³Çϱ⿡ ÀûÀýÇÑ À§Ä¡¶ó°í º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, 1-1°ú 1-2 »çÀÌ´Â ¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® ½Ä¸³À» À§ÇÑ ÃæºÐÇÑ Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ½ÇÇèÀÇ °á°ú·Î º¼ ¶§ ÇÇÁú°ñ°ú ¹Ì´ÏÀÓÇ÷£Æ®ÀÇ Á¢Ã˸éÀ» Áõ°¡½ÃÅ°±â À§Çؼ­´Â Ä¡Á¶Á¤¿¡¼­ Ä¡±Ù´ÜºÎ·Î 4¿Í 6 mm µÇ´Â ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ 30o ¶Ç´Â 45o·Î ½Ä¸³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ À¯¸®ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide clinical guidelines to indicate the best location for mini-implants as it relates to the cortical bone thickness and root proximity.

Methods: CT images from 14 men and 14 women were used to evaluate the buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness and root proximity from mesial to the central incisor to the 2nd molar. Cortical bone thickness was measured at 4 different angles including 0o, 15o, 30o, and 45o.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in cortical bone thickness between the second premolar/ first permanent molar site, central incisor/central incisor site, between the first/second permanent molar site and in the anterior region. A statistically significant difference in cortical bone thickness was also found when the angulation of placement was increased except for the 2 mm level from the alveolar crest. Interradicular spaces at the 1st/2nd premolar, 2nd premolar/1st permanent molar and 1st/2nd permanent molar sites are considered to be wide enough for mini-implant placement without root damage.

Conclusions: Given the limits of this study, mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage may be well placed at the 4 and 6 mm level from the alveolar crest in the posterior region with a 30¡Æ and 45¡Æ angulation upon placement.

Å°¿öµå

¹Ì´Ï ÀÓÇ÷£Æ®;ÇÇÁú°ñ µÎ²²;Ä¡±Ù°£ °Å¸®
Mini-implant;Cortical bone thickness;Root proximity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed